murata EnglishChineseJapanese
Region
GlobalNorth AmericaEurope


Home > Corporate Social Responsibility > Murata and the Environment > Environmental Accounting
Top Commitment
Recognizing Murata
Murata by the Numbers
Feature CSR Management Economic Relations with Stakeholders
Murata and the Environment
Murata Group Environmental Policy
Environmental Management
Environmental Action Plan and Performance
Overview of Environmental Impact
Environmental Accounting
Eco-Friendly Design
Green Procurement and Purchasing
Prevention of Global Warming
Effective Utilization of Resources and Reduction of Waste
Chemical Substances Management and Emissions Reduction
Prevent Environmental Accidents and Pollution
Promoting Eco-Friendly Physical Distribution and Packaging

Murata and People Third-Party Comments
Editorial Policies
Guideline Comparison Sheet
CSR Report
CSR Report by business site

Environmental Cost Management

Plans to Extend Our Cost Management System Overseas

Murata established its cost management system in 2003. This initiative enables the Company to evaluate the costs of environmental activities in its domestic manufacturing plants and subsidiaries and the results of these endeavors. Through the system, this information is subsequently linked to ongoing activities to reduce our environmental impact.

Since fiscal 2006, we have been preparing to introduce this system in our overseas factories. After surmounting various difficulties, the system is due to start operation from fiscal 2008.

Results and Analysis forFiscal 2006

Increase in Investment to Prevent Pollution

During fiscal 2006, the cost of Murata's environmental activities was ¥4 billion, and investment expenses totaled ¥1.7 billion.

Investment in such energy reduction technologies as cogeneration systems as part of our strategy to curb global warming dropped, leading to a decline in global environmental conservation investment. However, investment in pollution prevention increased, spurred by the installation of gas emission and wastewater treatment facilities accompanying new manufacturing plant construction.

Results of environmental activities included a reduction of 170,000 tons in greenhouse gas emissions arising from aggressive introduction of double-bundle refrigeration equipment.

Environmental Accounting

Classification Costs
(Millions of yen)
Investment (Millions of yen)
Fiscal 2005 Fiscal 2006 Fiscal 2005 Fiscal 2006
Cost manufacturingplant premises Pollution prevention 464 470 239 893
Global environmental conservation 364 319 1,178 512
Recycling 1,326 1,511 190 109
Cost for upstream/downstream
environmental conservation
149 120 0 0
Cost of management activities 429 472 0 97
Cost of social activities 164 200 1 1
Cost of R&D 1,468 930 129 96
Cost of environmental damage 0 0 0 0
Total 4,364 4,022 1,737 1,708

Environmental Accounting (Economic Effects/Physical Effects)

Economic Effects (Millions of yen)
Classification Cost effectiveness Return on investment
Fiscal 2005 Fiscal 2006 Fiscal 2005 Fiscal 2006
Cost manufacturingplant premises Pollution prevention 0 0 0 0
Global environmental conservation 259 166 1,835 3,823
Recycling 514 964 514 59
Subtotal 773 1,301 2,349 19,411
Cost for upstream/downstream
environmental conservation
17 0 - -
Cost of management activities 0 0 - -
Cost of social activities 0 0 - -
Cost of R&D 0 0 - -
Cost of environmental damage - - - -
Total 790 1,309 2,349 19,411

Physical Effects
Classification Cost effectiveness Return on investment
Fiscal 2005 Fiscal 2006 Fiscal 2005 Fiscal 2006
No. of cases exceeding regulation value 0 0 - -
Reduction in chemical substance emissions (tons) 189 359 - -
Reduction in GWG emissions (tons-CO2) 18,665 86,568 203,344 167,140
Savings in resources (tons) 211 3,239 394 -
Savings in water saving (m3) 686,611 279,610 604,662 -
Reduction in waste emissions (tons) 7,401 9,349 22,063 1,271
Increase in recycling (tons) 101 61 - -
Reduction in packaging materials (tons) 23 2 - -
  1. The scope of accounting includes Murata Manufacturing's plants and 17 subsidiaries in Japan.
  2. The accounting term is the 12-month period from April 1, 2006, to March 31, 2007.
  3. Costs include labor and depreciation.
  4. Proportional accounting is applied for compounded costs, in which the cost of environmental conservation is embedded in other costs.
  5. Putative effects avoidance of latent risk and other such factors are not calculated
  6. CO2 emission conversion factors use fuel and power figures from the Environment Agency (1992) Report on Carbon Dioxide Emissions.
  7. Quantitative effects of countermeasures are calculated as the difference between the outcomes of implementing and not implementing a countermeasure.
  8. Research and development costs are the total expenses for R&D intended primarily for environmental conservation.

Top of page