murata EnglishChineseJapanese
Region
GlobalNorth AmericaEurope


Home > Corporate Social Responsibility > Murata and the Environment > Prevent Environmental Accidents and Pollution
Top Commitment
Recognizing Murata
Murata by the Numbers
Feature CSR Management Economic Relations with Stakeholders
Murata and the Environment
Murata Group Environmental Policy
Environmental Management
Environmental Action Plan and Performance
Overview of Environmental Impact
Environmental Accounting
Eco-Friendly Design
Green Procurement and Purchasing
Prevention of Global Warming
Effective Utilization of Resources and Reduction of Waste
Chemical Substances Management and Emissions Reduction
Prevent Environmental Accidents and Pollution
Promoting Eco-Friendly Physical Distribution and Packaging

Murata and People Third-Party Comments
Editorial Policies
Guideline Comparison Sheet
CSR Report
CSR Report by business site

Avoiding Environmental Risk

Measures to Prevent Environmental Accidents and Pollution

Murata is aware that among the various potential environmental risks involved in its activities that chemical contamination is of particular concern. We endeavor to avoid such eventualities through preemptive preventive measures, training and other strategies. We also promote risk reduction countermeasures targeting such environmental risks as waste and related problems.

In Japan and overseas, Murata consigns industrial waste disposal to legally authorized specialist contractors for proper treatment. In addition, we conduct regular site visits to confirm the management status of disposal sites.

In fiscal 2006, Murata recorded neither environmental accidents nor violations of environmental standards.

Voluntary Standards for Prevention of Environmental Accidents and Pollution

  1. Prohibition against Underground Storage Tanks
    In principle, storage tanks for fuels, organic solvents, acids, alkalis and waste liquids and wastewater tanks for treating wastewater will be located above ground. If it is unavoidable that a tank be placed underground, it will be a double-walled tank.
  2. Permeation Barrier Coating
    Locations where such fluids as fuels, organic solvents, acids, and alkalis, as well as waste oil, are handled will be provided with a bed made of a permeation barrier coating or stainless steel.
  3. Prohibition of Underground Piping
    Pipes for transporting such fluids as fuels, organic solvents, acids and alkalis, as well as waste liquids, will be located above ground.
  4. Emergency Containment Structure
    Workplaces where liquids are received or where waste liquids are discharged to or from tank trucks or the like will have a structure for immediately containing any leakage if an accident occurs.

Surveys of Soil and Groundwater Contamination

Contamination Surveys of 36 plants and subsidiaries Using the Latest Technologies

To clean up soil and groundwater contamination generated by Murata's past business activities, Murata has undertaken surveys and countermeasures ahead of other companies. We are actively implementing measures targeting early stage completion of remediation (decontamination).

Specifically, by the time groundwater permeation was prohibited according to the terms of the 1989 Water Pollution Prevention Law, 17 of Murata's 22 production plants and subsidiaries had already ceased using chlorinated organic solvents (trichloroethylene and five other substances). Moreover, use had been completely eliminated throughout the Company by 1998.

In 1991, Murata conducted voluntary detailed surveys of soil and groundwater contamination in all plants and subsidiaries using the latest technologies. The results confirmed contamination caused by use of chlorinated organic solvents necessitating remediation measures at 14 of the Company's 36 plants and subsidiaries.

Progress with Remediation

At the 14 locations deemed in need of remediation, we sank observation wells along the borders of the sites so as to compile data on trichloroethylene and cis-1,2-dichloroethylene.

Plants and subsidiaries with relatively high pollution densities require an extensive period to complete remediation work. However, by supplementing existing methods with new technologies to facilitate completion within six months, we had completed cleanup at seven sites by fiscal 2005. For each site, depending on soil properties and the density and source of contamination we use one of three different remediation methods: the On-site Bio Method, the On-site Iron Powder Method or the Onsite Oxidation and Decomposition Method.

During fiscal 2006, we accelerated remediation at five sites: Hakui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Hakui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Togi Site, Iwami Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Fukui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shirayama Site and Fukui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Ozowara Site. We also concluded work at one new site, bringing the total of sites completed during the year to three.

Furthermore, Murata estimates the various costs incurred through to the completion of remediation work and enters them as liabilities in its corporate accounts.

  • On-site Bio Method
    This method decomposes chlorinated organic solvents by injecting nutrients into the groundwater, in order to cultivate microbes present in the soil under anaerobic conditions.
  • On-site Iron Powder Method
    Soil and iron powder are mixed on-site. The reducing power of metallic iron deoxidizes, decomposes, and renders harmless chlorinated organic solvents in soil.
  • On-site Oxidation and Decomposition Method
    This is an oxidation and decomposition method using potassium permanganate. This method entails the direct injection of hydrogen peroxide into the groundwater, which directly oxidizes, decomposes and renders harmless various chlorinated organic solvents.

State of Groundwater Remediation

Plant/subsidiaryTrichloroethylene (0.03≥)Cis-1,2-dichloroethylene (0.04≥) Remarks
Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Head Office, Nagaoka Plant0.020N.D.
Fukui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Takefu Plant0.013-- Preparation for completion
Fukui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Shirayama Site0.8910.258
Fukui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Miyazaki Plant1.3560.246
Asuwa Electronics Industries, Ltd.0.0010.012
Iwami Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.0.4731.016
Wakura Murata Manufacturing Co.,Ltd. N.D. -- Remediation complete
Himi Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.N.D.N.D.
Kanazu Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Kanazu Plant N.D. -- Remediation complete
Kanazu Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Natsume Plant0.0500.100
Hakui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd.N.D.0.056
Hakui Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd., Togi Site0.0020.211
Toyama Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. N.D. -- Remediation complete

(million yen)

Cost of Groundwater Contamination


Expenditure up to fiscal 2006 Estimate from fiscal 2007 Total
Non-consolidatea Consolidated Non-consolidatea Consolidated Non-consolidatea Consolidated
1,1177,8405313,4491,64811,289

Top of page